So far we have discussed selling hardware, software and information. One of my colleagues suggested we should address the selling challenges of the Software as a Services business model.
Hi Bruce,
These are the type of considerations one of the software company I am working with used in shifting their business model by 180 degrees 3 years ago. They got rid of their sales department scattered around the US and started to focus on an aggressive web marketing campaign. Anyone can download their software, no license charge (ever) but a revenue model based on an “optional” subscription annual fee. The software is world-class and has been adopted by many major organisations: Xerox, Lockheed Martin, Motorola, US Army….
Open Source:
The open source model I am referring to follows the “Microsoft Public License” (MsPL) strategy. Here are a few arguments behind this strategy and some of its benefits:
No License cost:
These are the major benefits for customers:
- The very first money a customer spends is already focused towards solving a problem and is not burnt in expensive evaluation cycles
- SOX, US-GAAP and revenue recognition policies for public companies have led to pushing more risk to the customer with traditional license contracts in the recent years. At the same time it puts a lot of pressure on a Sales Force of software solutions to make license deals as big as possible. With a lot of money involved customer are pressured to engage in long evaluations before making a buying decision. The open source model has eliminated these hurdles altogether
- Thus software providers and business partners can provide added value from day one without pushing the sales of software but setting focus on services and quick results
- Implementation projects do not need be made big and global from the start to justify high license investments and they do not need to feign high business value (only earned in later phases). They can start small and grow global, earning business value phase by phase
- To pilot a solution using such a model does not necessarily require CIO (IT) approval. Proof-of-concepts can be done at departmental level giving a business-champion all back up to demonstrate the potential improvements and business value
Regards Daniel Gelinas
I can think of several new issues and dilemmas that this model presents for the sales process:
- Is there a point in which we can consider the customer closed or committed to our product?
- Does the sales function evolve into a customer care function?
- How must the “sales” compensation plan be altered to take this revenue model into account?
- How do we manage sales activity?
{ 4 comments }